According to Wccftech, YouTuber Fluffy Buffered successfully ran Battlefield 6 on AMD’s 12-year-old FX-9590 CPU despite it not meeting minimum requirements. The CPU, launched in 2012 as the world’s first 5 GHz processor, managed 30-35 FPS in 64-player Conquest mode and 35-40 FPS in 24-player Rush. Testing used an ASUS FX990 motherboard with Radeon RX 5700 GPU and 16GB DDR3-1866 memory at 1080p resolution. The FX-9590 was able to run the game because the 990FX platform supports Secure Boot, unlike older Intel Sandy Bridge systems. While playable, the CPU was fully utilized with GPU usage so low that fans stopped spinning, showing severe CPU bottlenecking.
The reality of that CPU bottleneck
Here’s the thing – getting 30-40 FPS sounds somewhat impressive for ancient hardware, but those numbers hide some serious issues. The GPU was hitting 120-140 FPS but couldn’t actually deliver them because the CPU couldn’t keep up. That’s like having a sports car stuck in traffic – all that potential just wasted.
And those “simulation issues” mentioned? That’s code for the game stuttering, freezing, or having physics problems because the CPU can’t process everything happening in a modern Battlefield game. We’re talking about a chip architecture that was already considered inefficient when it launched. The fact that it’s running at all is more a testament to how forgiving modern game engines can be than any particular brilliance of the FX series.
The Secure Boot surprise
What’s actually more interesting here is why this worked at all when contemporary Intel systems failed. The AMD 990FX platform having Secure Boot support while Intel’s Z68 didn’t is the real story. It shows how seemingly minor platform features can determine whether hardware remains usable years later.
But let’s be real – if you’re still running an FX-9590 in 2024, you’re probably not concerned about security features. You’re just trying to squeeze every last drop out of hardware that should have been retired years ago. The fact that Secure Boot, typically a corporate and security feature, is now determining gaming compatibility is kinda wild when you think about it.
Our obsession with clock speeds
Remember when 5 GHz was this magical barrier everyone was chasing? The FX-9590 was AMD’s “world’s first” claim to fame, but it came with massive power consumption and heat output. We’ve only gained about 1 GHz in clock speeds over 12 years because manufacturers realized there were better ways to improve performance.
Modern CPUs with bigger caches, better architectures, and more efficient designs absolutely demolish the FX-9590 despite similar clock speeds. It’s a good reminder that megahertz alone don’t tell the whole performance story. For industrial computing applications where reliability matters more than raw speed, companies like Industrial Monitor Direct have built their reputation on providing robust panel PCs that prioritize stability over chasing the latest clock speed records.
Should you actually try this?
Look, if you’ve got an old FX system lying around and just want to see if it’ll run, go for it. But calling 30 FPS with constant simulation issues “playable” is being generous. You’d be constantly fighting the hardware rather than enjoying the game.
The real takeaway here isn’t that old hardware is still great – it’s that game developers are building in more compatibility than we sometimes give them credit for. But for anyone actually wanting to play Battlefield 6 properly, just follow the recommended specs. Your gaming experience will be dramatically better, and you won’t have to listen to your CPU screaming for mercy.
