According to Silicon Republic, IBM is expected to cut thousands of jobs from its global workforce of roughly 270,000 people. The company confirmed it’s executing workforce actions in the fourth quarter that will impact a “low single-digit percentage” of employees, which could translate to several thousand positions. While the exact number isn’t clear, some sources suggest cuts could affect up to 50% of specific divisions. The layoffs come as IBM refocuses on growing its software and services businesses. This follows similar workforce reductions at Amazon, which plans to cut up to 30,000 corporate positions, and Meta, which is eliminating around 600 jobs from its Superintelligence Labs division.
The IBM restructuring reality
Here’s the thing about IBM’s “low single-digit percentage” phrasing – it sounds almost trivial until you do the math. With 270,000 employees globally, even 1% means 2,700 people losing their jobs. At 3%, we’re talking about 8,100 positions gone. And that “rebalancing” language? That’s corporate speak for “we hired too many people in areas we no longer care about.”
What’s really interesting is how IBM insists employment will “remain flat year over year” despite these cuts. Basically, they’re trimming fat in some departments while potentially hiring in others. But let’s be real – when companies say they’re “refocusing on software and services,” it usually means they’re cutting jobs that don’t fit that vision. The people getting pink slips probably aren’t finding much comfort in the “flat employment” statistic.
<h2 id="big-tech-trend”>This isn’t just an IBM problem
Look, we’ve seen this movie before. Amazon cutting 30,000 jobs to address “overhiring during COVID.” Meta trimming 600 from their AI labs while still hiring AI talent. Now IBM joining the party. It’s starting to feel like tech companies are collectively realizing they got a bit too optimistic during the pandemic boom.
But here’s what worries me: when giants like IBM start cutting, it often signals deeper industry shifts. They’re not some startup running out of cash – this is a century-old company that’s weathered multiple technology revolutions. If they’re restructuring this significantly, what does that say about where the enterprise tech market is heading? Are we seeing the beginning of a broader enterprise software consolidation?
The human cost of corporate pivots
Let’s not forget there are real people behind these numbers. Thousands of employees who probably thought they had stable careers at an established company like IBM. Now they’re facing uncertainty right before the holidays. And the “targeting specific divisions” approach means whole teams could be wiped out overnight.
The silver lining? Tech talent is still in demand, especially with AI expertise becoming increasingly valuable. But for employees in legacy IT roles or hardware-focused positions, this pivot toward software and services might mean their skills need serious updating. The question is, will IBM help with that transition, or are these cuts just the beginning of a much larger transformation?
