According to The Wall Street Journal, a federal district court in Pennsylvania unsealed documents on January 6 from a lawsuit by Yael Canaan against Carnegie Mellon University. The suit alleges the school harbors antisemitism, influenced by over $1 billion in funding from Qatar and its affiliates. The court, on December 5, rejected CMU’s arguments and ordered it to produce documents, noting a “reasonable juror” could infer the “largesse of Qatari funds” motivates the university to abide by donor wishes. The filings reveal Qatari interests contributed to the salary of the school’s Title IX coordinator, Elizabeth Rosemeyer, and that CMU was required to “consult” with the Qatar Foundation before hiring her. This case emerges as the U.S. Education Department’s new transparency dashboard shows Qatar is the top foreign funder, providing $6.6 billion to U.S. institutions—50% more than second-place Germany.
The fine print on those giant checks
Here’s the thing: that money never really comes free. The court documents and other recent revelations suggest there are very real strings attached. We learned that Carnegie Mellon’s agreement with Qatar, like a similar one with Northwestern University, requires students and faculty to “respect the cultural, religious and social customs” of Qatar and follow its laws—which criminalize criticizing the government. Think about that for a second. A U.S. university, bound by the First Amendment, is contractually obligating its people to follow the speech laws of an autocracy.
And the connections get more personal. The court order notes at least three DEI-related officials involved in Canaan’s complaint had work-related visits to Qatar. The professor accused of harassment, Mary-Lou Arscott, worked there and received Qatari funding. The chief diversity officer even took the Fifth when asked about the case. So when the court says it’s “more probable” the Qatar relationship influenced how the school handled Canaan’s antisemitism complaints, it’s not exactly a wild leap. It looks a lot like a roadmap.
This isn’t a one-off problem
Look, this Carnegie Mellon case is just the one that got unsealed. The new federal transparency portal makes the scale crystal clear. Qatar’s $6.6 billion dwarfs everyone else. But let’s be honest, the problem is likely even bigger. A 2020 Education Department report warned that foreign funding reporting has been “systemically underinclusive and inaccurate.” Universities with the best lawyers and accountants somehow can’t figure out how to properly report billions in foreign cash? Come on.
So what’s the endgame? For Qatar, it seems to be building influence and “soft power” through elite Western institutions. For the universities, it’s a massive revenue stream for fancy buildings and research programs. But the trade-off is becoming uncomfortably clear. Are we selling academic freedom and the protection of students’ civil rights for new lab equipment? Basically, when a DEI officer’s salary is partially funded by a foreign government, whose sensitivities do you think they’ll prioritize?
So what can actually be done?
Congress is being called to step in, and they probably should. The author, who used to run civil rights at the Education Department, argues for more detailed financial disclosure and putting federal funds to schools at risk if these foreign ties lead to unlawful behavior. It’s a start. But here’s a depressing twist: on the very day the court order was unsealed, a Qatari outlet reported Carnegie Mellon is signing a new agreement to expand cooperation with Qatar. They’re not slowing down.
The core question is this: can U.S. universities be both global hubs *and* steadfast protectors of American civil rights and free inquiry? Or does the pursuit of foreign capital inherently compromise that mission? This lawsuit might just be the first real test case that forces the entire system to answer. And if the documents coming out of Carnegie Mellon are any indication, the answers won’t be pretty.
