According to Forbes, a landmark study by Bessembinder revealed that nearly 97% of stocks underperform simple Treasury bills after costs, with half of all publicly traded companies failing to create any wealth at all. The analysis argues that the entire $11.5 trillion ETF market represents weaponized behavioral biases that push investors toward comfortable diversification rather than superior returns. The article contends that true wealth creation requires concentrated ownership in the 3% of outlier winners, using Amazon Web Services’ multi-decade compounding success since its 2006 launch as a prime example. This contrarian perspective suggests that beating the market demands calculated concentration and the fortitude to hold winners through downturns.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The Mathematics of Extremes
What the Bessembinder research fundamentally reveals is that stock market returns follow a power law distribution, not the normal distribution that traditional finance assumes. In power law dynamics, outcomes aren’t clustered around an average—they’re dominated by extreme outliers. This explains why a tiny fraction of companies generate virtually all market returns while the majority either stagnate or destroy value. The technical reality is that diversification works beautifully in normally distributed environments but becomes mathematically suboptimal in power law systems. When you’re dealing with exponential growth curves rather than linear progressions, owning everything means you’re mathematically guaranteed to underperform the few true winners.
The Behavioral Trap
The financial services industry has built an entire ecosystem around managing investor psychology rather than optimizing returns. The industry’s approach systematically exploits loss aversion and recency bias—our tendency to overweight recent experiences and fear losses more than we value gains. This creates a perfect environment for promoting diversification as “safety” when it’s actually a recipe for guaranteed mediocrity. The psychological comfort of owning hundreds of stocks through ETFs masks the mathematical certainty that you’re diluting your exposure to the very companies driving market returns. This isn’t investing—it’s emotional management disguised as wealth building.
The Concentration Calculus
Successful concentration requires a fundamentally different approach to risk assessment. Traditional diversification treats all companies as carrying similar risk profiles, but the reality is that true risk lies in business quality, not stock price volatility. Companies with durable competitive advantages, scalable business models, and massive addressable markets actually represent lower long-term risk than the average stock, despite what their beta coefficients might suggest. The key insight is that volatility isn’t risk—permanent capital impairment is risk. By focusing on business fundamentals rather than price movements, concentrated investors can identify the rare companies capable of compounding value for decades.
Implementation Challenges
The practical challenge of concentrated investing lies in the cognitive and emotional demands it places on investors. Most people lack the temperament to watch concentrated positions experience significant drawdowns without panicking. Additionally, the research and due diligence required to properly identify potential outlier companies is substantially more demanding than simply buying an index fund. There’s also the timing element—many of today’s obvious winners weren’t obvious when they were in their early growth phases. The technical difficulty lies in developing frameworks for identifying future outliers before their growth stories become consensus, which requires deep industry knowledge and forward-looking analysis.
The Future of Investing
As more investors become aware of the power law dynamics in public markets, we’re likely to see a bifurcation in investment approaches. The majority will continue with traditional diversification for psychological comfort, while a growing minority will adopt more concentrated, research-intensive strategies. The emergence of new data analytics tools and alternative data sources may help identify potential outlier companies earlier in their growth cycles. However, the fundamental challenge remains human psychology—the ability to maintain conviction during inevitable market turbulence separates successful concentrated investors from those who revert to the comfort of diversification at the worst possible times.
