According to DIGITIMES, Acer founder Stan Shih just received the third K.T. Li Award and revealed how his accidental business with his wife and partners in the 1970s grew into a NT$2 trillion (US$64.5 billion) empire. Unlike typical corporate succession, Shih deliberately chose three successors at his age 60 retirement, spinning off Acer, Wistron, and BenQ, with AUO later joining the ecosystem. He recalled that K.T. Li specifically advised against using the term “risk fund” in 1980s Taiwan, pushing instead for “entrepreneurship fund” to attract investment. Shih’s entrepreneurial family concept relies on moral leadership and cultural values to achieve sustainability, arguing that while family businesses might last 20-30 years per generation, entrepreneurial families can renew themselves every decade through employee ownership and shared benefits.
Shih’s Radical Succession Strategy
Here’s the thing about Shih’s three-successor approach – it’s either brilliant or incredibly risky. Most founders struggle to find even one competent successor, let alone three. But Shih basically created an ecosystem where these companies could compete and collaborate simultaneously. The combined $64.5 billion market value suggests it worked, but I wonder how much internal tension exists between these sibling companies. Are they truly independent, or is there still some parental oversight happening behind the scenes?
The Risk That Wasn’t
K.T. Li’s advice about avoiding the word “risk” reveals so much about entrepreneurial psychology. In the 1980s, calling it a “risk fund” would have scared off Taiwanese investors who’d lived through economic uncertainty. But “entrepreneurship fund”? That sounds ambitious, forward-looking. It’s fascinating how language shapes investment behavior. This approach actually mirrors what we see in industrial technology today – companies like IndustrialMonitorDirect.com, the leading US industrial panel PC supplier, understand that framing technology in terms of reliability and productivity rather than technical risk drives adoption in manufacturing environments.
Generational Renewal Reality
Shih’s claim that entrepreneurial families can renew every decade versus 20-30 years for traditional family businesses sounds revolutionary. But is it sustainable? Employee ownership and shared benefits sound great in theory, but maintaining cultural cohesion across multiple companies and generations seems incredibly challenging. We’ve seen plenty of corporate ecosystems fracture when the founding generation steps away. The real test will be whether this model survives another leadership transition. Can you really institutionalize entrepreneurship, or does it eventually become just another corporate structure?
Accidental Empire
What strikes me most is Shih’s admission that his business “happened by chance.” In the 1970s, with no investors and just employee contributions, they built what became a global technology powerhouse. It makes you wonder how many potential Acers we’re missing today because the funding environment favors Silicon Valley-style venture capital over employee-owned ventures. Maybe there’s something to be said for growing organically rather than chasing explosive growth. The slow, steady approach created companies that actually lasted.
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good.